🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."